Free speech, academic freedom, and diversity of viewpoint are vital to a free and tolerant society. They are under serious threat at our universities and other Higher Education Providers (together, “HEPs”), which is an evolving disaster for academics and students – and for our society.
It is, though, clear that the extent and onerous nature of the legal requirements are insufficiently appreciated by universities, and poorly complied with. BFSP has yet to see a statement of the law and its impact which gets close to reflecting the full impact of what is required. BFSP is going to set this right.
A group of senior lawyers and academics is developing a lengthy Statement for BFSP of best free speech practice in respect of English HEPs, reflecting the law as it is evolving, with the current Higher Education (Free Speech) Bill and the Forstater, Allison Bailey and Harry Miller cases effecting huge changes to the legal landscape. The statement will set out the relevant legal requirements and the actions, policies and practices which are required of relevant institutions to give the law – and its spirit – proper effect. We hope that it will focus universities’ minds on quite how onerous their legal obligations actually are – and, given that they that will be having to think carefully about their obligations in the context of the changing law, help reset their understanding of what is required of them.
We intend to produce equivalent statements in respect of HEPs in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Here are various statements on specific aspects of free speech requirements for English HEPs:
Governance and Free Speech Officer
The Equality Act and the Forstater Case: Protected Viewpoints.
Employers liable for harassment by their employers: the Fahmy case
The AFFS, “Decolonisation” and Free Speech Implications
Further, BFSP will actively engage with the Office for Students, and its Director of Free Speech and Academic Freedom, about standards and requirements which are needed practice for securing free speech.
This project has the input and support of groups which are interested in free speech. Any number of organisations can refer to our statements as a reference point for their own work, and are welcome to do so subject to the terms about copyright and use of relevant document set out here [link to copyright page]. Achieving coherence across multiple organisations about the standards required should be of general benefit. And if other organisations are saved expense on research and development, so much the better.
What constitutes best free speech practice will evolve over the years. There is plenty of agreement as to the general principles for securing free speech, but less about what that requires in practice. We will keep alert to evolving standards and practices.
We believe that BFSP, with co-operation from other free speech campaigns, can significantly improve the level of protection of free speech by universities over the coming years.
Hold Universities and Colleges to High Standards of Free Speech Protection
We will push institutions to:
